GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. Country Music: Not a Good Influence? | For The Country Record
Jul
3

Share

Country Music: Not a Good Influence?

1.1284830445.legends-honky-tonk-bar

So I just came across this short article on the events of a recent Rascal Flatts concert. Basically a load of kids were arrested for underage drinking (or rather possession with intent to consume) in Darien Lake, NY, during a gig. Country’s always advocated the good-timin’ individual, the Honky-Tonk, etc although for some reason country has often harboured a rather conservative reputation. Perhaps it’s because they’re not quite as wild as rock and metal acts (although the line is significantly blurring) and because the ‘official core values’ of country remain domesticity in a patriarchal society, full of nostalgia for the ‘good ole days’ of a rural existence that was never a reality. Compared to that other genres can appear quite non-mainstream and forward-thinking. Add to that the accusations of racism and homophobia that often accompany country music’s history, although I think the racism argument can be put to bed now in light of further study into the advent of Rock ‘n’ Roll.

So country music’s conservative? Because of this reputation I think a lot of people have ignored just how hell raising country wants to be and has been for many years, just take a look at the lives of half of our legends. Hank Williams? Heavy drinker and womaniser. Johnny Cash and Merle Haggard? Spent time in prison. A large proportion of country songs are based on the Honky-Tonk tradition, hell an entire genre was named after a drinking and good-timin’ establishment.

Having said this I wouldn’t have said that Rascal Flatts are upholding that tradition. It is common knowledge that they are the more pop side of a pop-orientated Nashville, and having owned many of their albums for a number of years I can’t think of a song that glamourises a Honky-Tonk and drinking lifestyle. They produce mainly love songs, combined with bouncy, teen, summer, good-time songs which are more about going on a fun road trip with the gang than getting drunk.

However, fans of Rascal Flatts are fans of other country artists who do produce those heavy drinking songs, and even having said that it’s more a sign of teenagers being teenagers than the music they listen to. I hate people who say that rap makes kids kill people and stuff like that. It’s just not true. In addition the article does not say how old the kids were, just that they were underage. In the UK the drinking age is 18 and it is deemed perfectly acceptable to be drinking at concerts at that age. Personally I think the US age is bizarrely old just to drink alcohol and there comes a point where kids become interested in alcohol and can use it maturely so they really shouldn’t be bothered by things like this.

Either way, there is a drinking culture in working class America, and what the article probably doesn’t report is that this kind of thing no doubt goes on all over the place all the time. Because high schoolers drink, it’s a fact. And if they can use alcohol maturely I don’t see why not.

So I don’t country is a bad influence, but it certainly isn’t perfect. And if America thinks that drinking at gigs in your late teens is bad, it should take a look at its culture and reputation a little more, because that’s what’s to blame, not country music. I, for one, don’t think it’s a problem and think the drinking age should be lowered. You guys have bizarre logic, that’s for sure.

Although none of this accounts for the random acts of violence also mentioned in the article, that’s just acts of idiocy and dickheads.

(RE: a message I received, I neglected the part the venue has to play. I didn’t know its reputation but it seems this kind of thing happens a lot there and though I think my point still stands no doubt the nature of the venue and the area and the type of people who frequent it initiate this kind of behaviour.)

About Vickye

I run this joint. Country music blogger extraordinaire, fangirl, coffee drinker, Twitterer, bunny lover and rather too opinionated for her own good. Feminist and equal rights advocate. Has a laugh that you can hear for miles.
This entry was posted in Editorials and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Country Music: Not a Good Influence?

  1. Musiclv says:

    Wow this is awesome! Not only for musicians but also for documentation purposes.

Share your voice!