GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. Rascal Flatts ‘Rewind’ – Single Review | For The Country Record
Feb
4

Share

Rascal Flatts ‘Rewind’ – Single Review

Rascal-Flatts-Rewind-2014-1200x1200

I’m not Rascal Flatts’ biggest fan, by any means, in fact I think most of their songs sound the same and they are way too pop for me to stomach (plus how creepy are most of their publicity shots, right?), but I’m not too proud to admit I have enjoyed many a Rascal Flatts song in the past, they know how to pick ‘em. Which is why them releasing ‘Rewind’ and coming out with this bullcrap about a new era, a new sound, a new image etc (blatantly Big Machine’s attempt to mould everyone into plasticine puppets – just like Tim McGraw) is so ridiculous – it’s just not a great song. Sure, RF may often sound the same and they’re too polished for me (I like a bit of grit – rawr) but at least they know a solid track when they hear one. Apparently not for whomever picked this.

‘Rewind’ largely has production issues. Sitting on an R&B drum machine beat and mostly-muted acoustic guitar, they throw a horribly warped pitchy electric guitar riff in there to make it sound as unsettling as they possibly can. Great plan for what is clearly meant to be a bro-country summer song. Then there’s the pitch correction and the editing on everything. I don’t know how something can sound so eerily sparse and one-block-of-noise compressed at the same time but they’ve managed it. Maybe that’s what they were going for.

Lyrically it’s full of summer love clichés with a twist of “un”ing and “re”ing it all – turning back time, rewinding, etc, we get it. It goes on just a little too long, and while when it comes to bro-country standards this theme is alarmingly innovative, it just doesn’t wash really with me. It’s too generic, too much of trying to get into the in-crowd. They’re trying to be clever, and it simply doesn’t work. Musically this song could blend on the radio so well you wouldn’t even know it was there. It’s so bog-standard pop-sounding the only thing that makes it distinctive is the awful production, and the less said about that the better. I mean, perhaps I’m over-doing it on the criticism. I can see plenty of people lapping this up cause it’s fairly pleasant on the ears and doesn’t challenge anyone – it’s just bland, boring and uncreative, and that’s where I find my problem. They’re trying too hard to ramp things up again, and what Scott Borchetta has done for RF and Tim McGraw is he’s screwed with what works and done a really poor job of presenting something new.

Get it off my dial (or internet page, what’s a radio again?).

About Vickye

I run this joint. Country music blogger extraordinaire, fangirl, coffee drinker, Twitterer, bunny lover and rather too opinionated for her own good. Feminist and equal rights advocate. Has a laugh that you can hear for miles.
This entry was posted in Single Reviews and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Share your voice!