GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. Stella Parton (Dolly’s Sister) Is Having A Meltdown | For The Country Record


Stella Parton (Dolly’s Sister) Is Having A Meltdown


A lot of you may not be familiar with Stella Parton, the younger sister of Dolly, but as a self-confessed Dollyite and with friends who have known her I have vaguely kept up with her career. She has long been a successful singer, songwriter and actress; 4 years Dolly’s junior, she has released an impressive 16 original studio albums and 6 compilations; she has appeared in Dukes of Hazzard as well as plenty of productions on Broadway, including a version of ‘The Best Little Whorehouse In Texas’, the film version of which starred her more famous sister in 1982. She has also charted many country singles, mostly throughout the 1970s and 1980s.

So this successful 64-year-old has had a respectful, illustrious career with plenty to celebrate and build upon, despite the fact that nowadays many have forgotten or never knew of her existence. So why she decided to record an EDM (electronic dance music) album, called ‘Resurrection’, I have absolutely no idea. Much of it consists of intensely remixed versions of prior hits – songs like ‘Legs’ and ‘Danger of A Stranger’, those of which sound ultimately bizarre when adapted for a club setting. These gentle, perhaps twee, simple country love songs, and fun, novelty tracks sound altogether ridiculous, in fact, when set in such a computerized fashion, steeped in hedonism. What’s more, the original vocals, even sped up, do not fit the modern beats because of the style of her delivery, and it just comes across embarrassingly amateur.

There are also a few new songs thrown in there, although they equally sound as odd. Of course, artists are allowed to experiment with different genres, even as polarized as this, and this is not the reason I’m claiming her meltdown. Rather, her attempt to “get down with the kidz” is showcased in its full capacity here, in this promotional video:

Can we just draw our attention to the orange afro, the sparkly stripper dress and the fact that this 64-year-old looks like a drag queen? Walking into a club full of people in their 20s and 30s, a lot of them are probably wondering who this grandpa-in-denial is. Personal offences aside, her performance style involves standing awkwardly and clapping to the beat while young black men dance sexually next to her, at one point grinding up against her whilst barely wearing any clothes, as she caresses him. Her light, spindly voice cowers behind the music, performed to a room full of people who stand and stare, perhaps in horror.

The fact that someone who has lived a dignified career and been successful in her own right feels the need to completely make a fool out of herself and so something that is frankly embarrassing is sad and needs addressing. I’m not sure anyone can quite figure this out. Whether EDM is your thing or not, I think we can establish that Stella is not suited to it, and while we can applaud her for trying something new, the cringeworthy way in which she goes about the recordings and also her album promo video performance prompts me to think that she may well have lost her mind. This doesn’t scream publicity stunt because it just doesn’t have the promotion to push it into the public eye, I only know about it because a friend who is a fan passed it on. So who knows. Either way, if Stella thought “doing what the young ones do” would boost her album sales, she’d be wrong. Take a leaf out of your sister’s book, eh?

About Vickye

I run this joint. Country music blogger extraordinaire, fangirl, coffee drinker, Twitterer, bunny lover and rather too opinionated for her own good. Feminist and equal rights advocate. Has a laugh that you can hear for miles.
This entry was posted in Editorials and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Stella Parton (Dolly’s Sister) Is Having A Meltdown

  1. bob says:

    I read that the awful Luke Bryan album “Crash My Party” has sold over 1.5 million copies. Best album of 2013 to me was Brandy Clark’s “12 Stories”. Is it likely that “12 Stories” will reach sales of even 100,000 copies?

  2. bob says:

    oops! I clicked on the wrong comment box. I must have had a senior moment. My comment yesterday was supposed to be for the chart round-up.

    • Vickye says:

      haha that’s okay! Just finding out how many copies Brandy Clark has sold thus far to compare. However, I think it’s unlikely that it’ll reach 50,000 copies sadly. She’s just not releasing music that fits the trends – so good for music fans, bad for her career success. But it depends how you measure success.

Share your voice!