GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. iTunes UK Country Chart Roundup – Week of 31st March, 2015 | For The Country Record


iTunes UK Country Chart Roundup – Week of 31st March, 2015


Perhaps because tongues wagged when she performed at Kenny Chesney’s launch of The Big Revival tour in Nashville and planted a big kiss on his lips, perhaps because she won at the recent iHeartRadio Awards, or maybe just because she’s Taylor Swift, but the pop superstar’s country-labelled back catalogue in back on the up on Country Albums this week. ‘Red’ takes the top spot, followed by its deluxe version at #8 and a host of others; these include ‘Speak Now (Bonus Track Version)’ at #11, ‘Taylor Swift’ at #12, ‘Fearless (Platinum Edition)’ at #14 and ‘Fearless’ at #19. The Shires, meanwhile, are bringing up the rear at #2 and #13 with their deluxe and standard versions of ‘Brave’, while Darius Rucker brings a new entry at #3 with ‘Southern Style’, his fourth country album released just yesterday. Also relatively new to the chart are Striking Matches, whose debut album ‘Nothing But The Silence’ remains at #4 after surviving the potential second-week drop.

Dolly Parton as usual is making her presence known on the chart, as ‘Blue Smoke’ takes #10, ‘The Very Best of’ takes #21, and her inclusion in the compilation album ‘First Ladies of Country’ sees it hold strong at #7. Shania Twain, too, picks up the throwback baton for two versions of ‘Come On Over’ at #6 and #17 respectively, while Tim McGraw’s ‘Love Story’ compilation mysteriously jumps to #9 this week. There’s also Johnny Cash, although his usual multiple entries are narrowed down to just one this week: ‘The Legend of Johnny Cash’ at #5, above John Denver’s ‘Ultimate Collection’ at #18 and Glen Campbell’s ‘Twenty Gold Greats’ at #23. And of course, such is the popularity of compilations and Greatest Hits records, there are two miscellaneous ones here this time around, at #15 and #24.

All things told, it’s a story of Taylor Swift and the oldies on this week’s chart, although The Music of Nashville sees ‘Season 2: Volume 2’ and ‘Season 1: Volume 2’ lurk further down at #16 and #20, and Luke Bryan’s ‘Crash My Party’ peeps in at #22. Even Lady Antebellum are hardly noticeable, with ‘Own The Night’ just making it into the roundup at #25. A similar picture exists on Country Songs, with Miss Taylor dominating (she steals the top four spots and many others going down), as only Lady A manage to challenge her with ‘Need You Now’ at #5. Entries from Johnny Cash, Shania Twain, John Denver and Dolly Parton serve to litter much of the rest of the top 25, although Kacey Musgraves’ ‘Biscuits’ enjoys a place at #14 and The Shires’ ‘Friday Night’ holds at #17. There’s also Carrie Underwood’s ‘Something In The Water’ at #20, Faith Hill’s ‘This Kiss’ at #19, The Band Perry’s ‘If I Die Young’ at #24 and Uncle Kracker’s ‘Follow Me’ at #25, but if we’re looking for current material Kacey, The Shires and perhaps Carrie are the only ones ticking that box. Not a very good place to be at.

That’s it for this week; come back next Tuesday for another iTunes UK country chart roundup!

About Vickye

I run this joint. Country music blogger extraordinaire, fangirl, coffee drinker, Twitterer, bunny lover and rather too opinionated for her own good. Feminist and equal rights advocate. Has a laugh that you can hear for miles.
This entry was posted in Chart Roundups and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to iTunes UK Country Chart Roundup – Week of 31st March, 2015

  1. Livewire says:

    Ridiculous that all the C2C main stage and Pop Up acts can’t put a dent in Taylor Swift’s years old sets, Shania’s 90s music and deceased musicians. The vast numbers of C2C Pop Up UK artists really are going to have to work on their single & promotion because people simply aren’t buying unless they can sell them at the few live shows and festivals they play. The Shires will be hoping they can shift a ton more on their April Tour with now 16,300 copies sold in 4 chart frames. If so they just might hang on to a Top 100 place in weeks 5 & 6.
    An Official UK Top 100 debut for Striking Matches selling 800-900 copies. Their album is tagged “country” on iTunes yet the Official Chart Company are not classifying them as country hence no Country Chart place, just Why?!

    • C Chadwick says:

      Hey Livewire, I agree but I feel its just not that simple for a pop up stage artist to compete with a grammy award winning artist who has a multi million pound record deal and 100 million fans around the world to buy her records, If someone fancies signing me up and offering to pay for my marketing and promotion then I’m as ready as il ever be, But in the real world until then i have to pay what i can afford to get my music out there… its a rich mans game, and unless your rich or signed you cant compete… 🙁

Share your voice!